RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05366
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She receives flight incentive and flying/ground training period
pay for the period of 20 Aug 12 to 7 Apr 13.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 15 Sep 11, she sustained an injury in the Line of Duty (LOD).
On 20 Aug 12, she was medically restricted from flying duties as
a result of her injury.
On 8 Apr 13, she was deemed unfit for military duty.
The loss of flight and training period pay was the result of a
LOD injury and she is entitled to back pay.
In support of her request, she provides copies of AFRC IMT 348,
Informal Line of Duty Determination and AF IMT 1971,
Certification for Incapacitation Pay.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a member of the Air Force Reserve.
AFRC IMT 348 dated 14 Dec 11, reflects that she incurred an
injury while on active duty orders from 14 Sep 11 to 24 Sep 11,
and the injury was determined to be in the LOD.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. Air Force members must meet the
medical standards and applicable Reserve medical guidance to be
considered medically qualified to participate in any pay or
point gaining activity In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2254,
Volume 1, Reserve Personnel Participation. Additionally, IAW
AFI 48-123, Medical Examinations and Standards, participation in
any pay or point gaining activity is not permitted until the
disqualifying condition has been removed or an approved waiver
is received from AFRC/SG.
Any Inactive Duty Training (IDT) which is missed due to the
medical limitation will be considered excused until the profile
is finalized by AFRC/SGP or is removed.
The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 21 Mar 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, this office has not received a response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-05366 in Executive Session on 28 Aug 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Nov 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 21 Feb 14.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00106
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. AFRC/A1K states after reviewing the documentation provided by the applicant he has failed to provide a completed AF IMT 348 with a recommendation and signature from the appointing authority; an AF IMT...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03938
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the Air Force Reserve and was on active duty orders from 13 Oct 09 to 9 Jun 10. The supporting Reserve Medical Unit (RMU) was not notified of this until Apr 10; therefore, no LOD determination or profile action was taken prior her being placed on long term orders. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00789
According to information provided, it appears the applicant was not granted MEDCON orders due to the following information: The time and date of initial treatment as stated on the AFRC IMT 348 was 28 Jan 2012 [sic]. The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends amending the applicants orders for the period 14 Sep 12 19 Dec 12. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02444
A complete copy of the AFRC/SGP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not provided any supporting documentation that substantiates that a DD Form 214 should have been issued for the period of service in question (i.e., active duty orders reflecting that she completed 90 continuous days or more of active duty, or reflecting that she has been involuntarily mobilized during the event of a national emergency or war under 10 USC 12301, 12302, 12304,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01087
During that time he received two in the LOD injuries. The SAF/AA policy states that airmen are entitled to be returned to active duty to satisfy pay and entitlements, medical evaluation and treatment and processing through the DES but they must have a medical diagnosis rendering them unable to perform military duties and a LOD determination documenting that the injury/illness was incurred or aggravated in the LOD. In this case, the applicant was injured on active duty but was cleared to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03777
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03777 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00670
In support of his requests, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his AF Form IMT 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination (LOD); AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status; AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; Reserve Order A-150, memorandums and various other documents associated with his requests. The Air Force Military Personnel Data System reflects the applicant is ineligible to reenlist due to Poor Fitness Score. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02147
________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval, noting the applicants record should be amended to reflect, as a minimum, the applicant was placed on active duty orders for pay and points on 5 Mar 11 and remained so until his medical retirement effective 29 Aug 12. The applicants request is duly noted; however, we did not find the evidence provided substantial enough to override the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00276
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00276 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect that he was not released from his active duty orders on 20 May 2011 but continued on those orders through 16 Mar 2012 when his Line of Duty (LOD) was completed. The applicants condition was an injury and thus did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00701
As a result of the investigation, the recommended finding was "In Line of Duty." As a result of the investigation, the recommended finding was "In Line of Duty." The applicant's contentions are duly noted; however, insufficient evidence has been provided showing that at the time of his separation, he suffered from a medical condition that should have been evaluated in the disability evaluation system.